Thursday 23 April 2015

EXPLAIN RES-JUDICATE AND RES-SUBJUDICE AND ALSO EXPLAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RES-JUDICATE AND RES-SUBJUDICE ?

  

What is Res-Judicata?




Res-judicata:==========================
The doctrine of Res-judicata is enunciated in section (11) of C.P.C is in the following words:
According to section (11), "No Court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter' directly and substantially has been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim, litigating under the same title, in a Court competent to try such subsequent suit or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised, and has been heard and finally decided by such Court."

Res-judicata Meaning:
===============================

Res-judicata technically means that a matter in issue which has already been tried by competent Court, then trial between the same parties in-respect of the same matter shall not be allowed. Res-judicata is very important doctrine of C.P.C, it emphasis that a subject matter of the suit which has already been decided, is deemed to be decided forever, and can't be reopened by the same parties. The rule of Res-judicata is based upon the principle that no person should be vexed twice for the same cause of action, and the interest of the State behind this principle is that, there should be an end to litigation.


Object of Res-judicata
================================


The object of Res-judicata is to prevent a question which has already been decided to be re-agitated. A question finally decided at one stage of a proceeding cannot be re-agitated between the same parties or their representatives at a subsequent stage.


Kinds of Res-judicata:
==================================

There are two kinds of Res-judicata namely; Actual Res-judicata and Constructive Res-judicata.

Actual Res-judicata:
=================================

It means a matter actually resolved by Court, between the parties in earlier suit cannot be reopened through subsequent suit. In-other words an issue has been alleged by one party and either denied or admitted, (expressly or impliedly) by other party in earlier suit, second suit in respect of the same matter can not be filed, and if any is filed, the same would be hit by actual Res-judicata.

Constructive Res-judicata:
==================================

It means a matter which might and ought to have been made ground of claim or defense in a former suit, but a party ignores it, then that issue shall be deemed to have been a matter directly and substantially in issue in such suit. In other words if a party had an opportunity that he ought to have taken a plea (as a plaintiff or defendant) if he fails to do so, and the matter is decided, the decision will operate as Res-judicata in-respect of all issues, which were taken, and which ought and might have taken/ and second suit would not lie for such issue.


Essential conditions of res-judicata:
=====================================

For applicability of Res-judicata the following conditions must be present:

1. A previous suit in which the matter in issue directly and substantially should have been decided.

2. A competent Court of Civil jurisdiction should have decided it.

3. It should have been decided on merits and final decision should have been made after hearing.

4. It should contain directly and substantially same matter in issue.

5. It should have been contested between the same parties or their legal representatives, such parties are indulging litigation under the same title, with respect to the same cause of action. If these conditions are fulfilled then subsequently/further instituted suit shall be liable to be dismissed by application of doctrine of Res-judicata.

What is Res-Subjudice?

Res-subjudice:
==========================

The doctrine of Res-subjudice is contained in section (10) of C.P.C in the following words: According to section (10), No 

Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a 

previously instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating 

under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other Court in Pakistan having jurisdiction to grant 

the relief claimed, or in any Court beyond the limits of Pakistan established or continued by the Central Government and 

having like jurisdiction, or before the Supreme Court.

Res-subjudice Meaning:
=========================

Res-subjudice technically means that a matter in issue, which is already under the judicial scrutiny, then other 

proceeding of trial in-respect of same matter in issue shall not be allowed.


Object of Res-subjudice:
==========================
The object of Res-subjudice is to prevent Courts of concurrent jurisdiction from trying two parallel suits, in respect of 

the same matter simultaneously.


Essential Conditions of Res-subjudice:
=================================

For applicability of Res-subjudice the following conditions must be present:

1. The matter in issue subsequent suit must be the same, which is directly and substantially in issue in previously 

instituted suit.

2. The previously instituted suit must be pending in the same Court or in any other Court in Pakistan, or in any Court 

beyond Pakistan established with the authority of the Federal Government.

3. The previously instituted suit must be pending in a competent Court of civil jurisdiction.

4. The parties in both suits must be the same. If these conditions are fulfilled the subsequently further instituted suit 

shall be stayed by applying Res-subjudice.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN  RES-JUDICATE AND RES-SUBJUDICE ?

Differences:
1. The doctrine of Res-judicata is contained in section (11) of C.P.C, which provides when and how it can apply, while 

the doctrine of Res-subjudice is contained in section (10) of C.P.C, which provides when and how it can apply.

2. In Res-judicata the Court shall not try at all a case, which has previously tried, while in Res-subjudice the Court shall 

not proceed with a case, in-respect of which a suit is already pending.

3. Res-judicata deals with cases, which have already been decided by a Court of competent jurisdiction, but Res-

subjudice deals with cases which are pending before the Court of competent jurisdiction.

4. Res-judicata prohibits second trial of the same dispute between same parties, while Res-subjudice prohibits 

proceedings of two parallel suits between same parties.

Conclusion:
====================

So it can be concluded that by applicability of Res- judicata the Court shall not try a suit, which has already been tried, on the other side by applicability of Res-subjudice the Court shall not proceed-with a suit which is already pending 
before the Court of competent jurisdiction. The main spirit behind these two principles isthat no person should be call in question twice for the same cause of action.

SAMPLE OF SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MAINTENANCE



IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE / FAMILY JUDGE LAHORE


Family Suit No.______________ /2015

Name of Plaintiff     
…..PLAINTIFFS
VERSUS
Name of Defendant
…..DEFENDANT
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MAINTENANCE

Respectfully Sheweth
  1.     That the plaintiff No.1 was marriage with defendant on 11-09-2011, in   accordance to Muslim family laws of Pakistan, against the dower amount of 100,000/- which is still unpaid. The copy of Nikahnama was attached herewith and annexed as “A”.
  2.     That after  solemnization of marriage  one issue namely  ……. was born on 23-06-2012,  during the tenor of marriage the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant got worse, as on the third day of the marriage the defendant started abusing the plaintiff and beat the plaintiff as well, as the defendant was in toxic condition and asked about the paper for divorce, and after two days of this incident the plaintiff went to the house of her mother, and the plaintiff returned back to the house of the defendant on 20-09-11. But during the tenor of marriage on many occasions insulted the plaintiff on bitty matters, but in the year2012, the disputes got so worse the defendant in anger cut the nerve of his hand, the relative of the defendant took him to the Hospital for treatment, afterwards the plaintiff and the defendant went to house of the mother of the plaintiff for taking rest in the house, but after two days time the defendant again made a fight with the plaintiff and her family members, and went back to his house and since then he never have contacted the plaintiff, nor paid any money towards the maintenance of her and the minor child, and since then the plaintiff is raising the minor by earning the bread and butter for her. The copy of the birth certificate was attached and annexed “B”.
  3.    That since 2012, the defendant never contacted the plaintiff nor paid any money towards the maintenance of her and the minor child, and since then the plaintiff is raising the minors by earning the bread and butter for her.
  4.     That the defendant is working in private factory and his earning is Rs. 20,000/= every month, the plaintiffs claim maintenance for Plaintiff No.1 @ Rs. 4000/= from 11-09-2011 and maintenance for Plaintiff No.2 @ Rs. 4000/= since her birth.
  5.     That the cause of action for the instant suit accrued firstly on 11-09-2011, when the plaintiff married to the defendant, secondly, when the defendant left the house of the plaintiff mother in the year 2012. And the cause of action is still continuing as the defendant did contact the plaintiff for any consolidation.
  6.     That the plaintiffs are residing within local limits of Police Station …….. that fall within the territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
  7.      That the proper court fee has been affixed as per law.

PRAYER
It is therefore, very humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be please to pass judgment and decree in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as under:-
  •     To direct the defendant to pay past maintenance to the plaintiffs at the rate of Rs.4,000/= per month from 11-09-2011, up till now and in future upto iddat period.
  •     to direct the defendant to pay past maintenance to the plaintiffs at the rate of Rs.4,000/= per month since her birth on increment of 10% in future till her marriage.
  •     Cost of the suit.
            Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.



                                                PALINTIFF
              Through
Advocate
Dated:____/01/2015

Pakistani Awam Ki Mushkilat

 Ajjkal Pakistani Awam ko Kayi Mushkilat Darpaesh Hain Jismein Awal Number Per Mere Mutabiq Mehngai Hai Aur Dusre Number Per Laqanooniat. Go...