Biography of Quaid-E-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah In Roman Urdu

Quaid-E-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah

(Biography)

Ibtadai zindagi / Initial life

Babe islam sindh ke mashor shehar Karachi me Monday ke din (Sunday nahi jesa k amoman kitabon me darj hai) December 1876 ki 25 tarikh ko wo jurat mand farzand islam paida hua jis me mehkom bareazam hind me bil akhir apni anthak mehnat, gair mamoli zahanat, awami tanzim or hama gir jadujehad se 14 august 1947 mutabiq 27 ramzan Mubarak ko ek azad khud mukhtar mumlikat islamia qaim kar ke dam lya. Karwane milat ke is azimul martabat sipa salar ne December 1913 me Karachi k eek jalse me taqrir karte hue khud farmaya tha k “mujhe be inteha khushi mehsos ho rahi hai k ye wahi shehar hai jahan me paida hua.” 
Bartania me 1913 me jab qaid-e-azam ne (jo abhi mister Muhammad ali Jinnah kehlate the) apna passport banwaya to us me bhi apni jae pedish “Karachi” likhi or tarikh pedasih “25 december 1876” khud darj ki. Pakistan ke qayam se pehle November 1946 karachi me hakumat hind ne qaid ka jo passport banaya us me bhi yahi darj tha yani jae pedaish “Karachi” tarikh padaish 25 december 1876 hai.  

Qaid ki wiladat born

Jinnah ponja pr allah ka karam ye tha k un ke han pehla hi farzand wo paida hua jis ki qismat me mulk or milat ki taqdir sazi likhi thi. Bare azam hind ki huriyat or azadi or musalmaon ki khush nasibiyan khud us ke nasibe me samet aai thi. 
Is bache ki pedaish hi ke waqt se baqol qaid ki ham shirah muhtarma shiren Jinnah gharane ki zaban pr tha k “ye bacha ek din badshah ho ga.” Us waqt yahi samjha gya jesa k har bache ki maa bap or azizon ko arzo hoti hai k un ka bacha bara ho kar bara admi bane balke bare se bara admi ho, or bare se bara admi raja badshah or farma rawa hi samjha jata hai. haqiqatan is ki khabar kis ko thi k qudrat ek din sach much is bache se musalimanan bareazam ki taqdir sazi ki khidmat lene wali hai. ye bacha bara ho ga to mulk or milat ko mehkumi ki qed se nikale ga, azad karae ga, or “be taj badshah” bhi kehlae ga. Ek mumlikat ka bani or farma rawa ho ga. 
Bache ke mammon qasim mosa, aga khan awal ke senior wazir, Mubarak badiyon or duaon ki sogat le kar pohnche or unhon ne apne bhanje ka nam “Muhammad ali” rakha. Jinnah ponja ke gharane me amoman sabiq hindu gharanon ki nasbat namon ke sath raij thi magar ye pehla moqa tha k is bache ka nam khalis islami rakha gya zahiri sabab ye hai k bache ki maa ka khanoada sar zamin iran se taluq rakhta tha. “jetran” gujrati lafz hai is ke maini “duble patle” ke hain. Qaid ke walid charier badan ke the or un ka qad chota tha. Isi munasibat se “jetra” ya jena kehlate the magar un ke andaz ye tagir aya k wo apna nam “jena ponja” ki jaga “Jinnah ponja” likhne lage. Arbi me soti munasibat rakhne wale lafz “Jinnah” ke maini “bazu” or “she par” ke hain. Qaid ke walid ne apne nam ka imla or talafuz badal lya tha. Wo jena ko angrezi me “Jinnah” likhne lage the or unhon ne “ponja ko bhi” “ponjah” kar dya.  

Ibtadai Talim Initial Education

No umar Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ne apni ibtadai talim 1883 me affiant warnakiolar mission school (desi zabanon ka mission school barae atfal) boltan market se shuru ki jo 1876 me qaim hua tha. Unhon ne wahin se 4th class gujrati ki talim puri ki. 
Qaid ke walid na sirf ek muziz tajir the balke sahibe ilm bhi the or mission school me mulami ki khidmat bhi anjam dete the. Unhon ne angrezi zaban ke charch mission school ke bajae apne bête ko sindh madarsatul islam me dakhla dilwaya. Ye school 1885 me sir syed ke madarsatul alum ali garh ke 10 sal bad qaim hua tha. School me nanhe mune “qaid” ka dakhla 1887 ki 4 july ko angrezi ki pehli jamat me hua. Chand mah wo madarsa chor kar bambai chale gae jahan un ke mamo qasim mosa rehne lage the. Karachi se bambai tak ye samundari safar un ki zindagi ka pehla lamba safar tha or phir sari zindagi safar hi me guzri. Jinnah ponjah ne bhi waha apna ek karobari daftar khol lya tha. 
Bambai me behtar talim ke mawaqa Karachi se yaqinan zyada the. Bambai pohnche to waha un ka dakhla anjuman islam high school ki pehli jamat angrezi me hua magar school ke record se wazah hota hai k wahan un ka qayam chand mahinon se zyada nahi raha. Wo apni walida se dor nahi reh sakte the. Un ko apni maa se behad muhabat thi or un ki maa bhi apne bête ko beinteha chahti thin or pyar se “Muhammad” keh kar pukarti thin. Maa ki yad ne sataya to jald hi Karachi wapas agae or wapsi pr un ka dakhla phir sindh madarsatul islam me 23 december 1887 ko hua. Register me dastakhat ke khane me gujrati me “muhammad” lafz numaya hai. usi register me anjuman islam high school bambai bhi likha hua hai is lye bambai ke kisi or school ka nam likhna durst nahi jesa k boht si kitabon me darj hai. 
Qaid ke walid talim ki ahmiyat ko khob samjhte the. Bambai gae to wahan bhi bête ka fori dakhla karwaya or wapas Karachi aae to yahan bhi dakhla me takhir na ki or talim ko kisi hal me bhi nazar andaz nahi hone dya. Chand hi mahinon ne no umar Muhammad ali Jinnah ne imtehan dya or kamyab ho ka roper ki jamat me pohnch gae. 4th clas tak musalsal talim pate rahe. Phir un ka nam “tawil gair hazri” ki waja se register se kharij ho gya. Ye zamana 1890 ka hai or yahi wo zamana hai jab un ke walid ke karobar ko shaded khasare ka samna hua tha. Mumkin hai is parishani ked or me jab un ke walid zyada tar bahar kid or dhop me mashgol the daftar ki zarori dekh bhal or khat kitabat wagera ke lye bête ko daftar me rehna para ho lekin imtehan ko jab chand mah baqi reh gae to naye sal ke agaz me phir Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ne school me dakhla le lya imtehan me shirkat ki or bari itminani se intehanat me kamyabi bhi hasil ki. Galiban wo ghar pr apni kitaben parhte rahe hon ge. Wese bhi allah tala ne un ko behtar zehan ata kya tha. Raton ko un ke walid ke doston me se koi mulim un ko parha raha ho ga. Achool se “tawil gair hazri” ke bawajud un ki parhai me kisi qisim ka khalal waqa hone ke asar nahi milte. 
Muhammad ali Jinnah jab 5th class me the jabhi un ke walid ne un ko englistan bhejne ka irada kar lya tha or isi irade ke bad maa ki taraf se israr hua k hamare “Muhammad” ki pehle shadi kar di jae or phir wilayat bheja jae. Is jamat ke imtehanat me bhi chand mah baqi the k shadi ka masla bich me agya. Zahir hai k maa ki tamana aham thi bilkhasus aesi sorat me jabke maa ki sehat bhi achi na thi or un ko ye andesha bhi tha k beta wilayat se koi mem na le aae. Apne “Muhammad” pr mukamal bharosa hone ke bawajud ye us waqt balke ab bhi har maa ke dil ki fitri khatak hai. shadi ho jane ke bad safar englistan se itna andesha na tha. January 1892 ki dastavizat batati hain k Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai school chor kar shadi ke lye “kuch” rawana ho gae. 
Muhammad ali abhi khud puri tarha balog ki umar me nahi pohnche the to zahir hai un ki dulhan or bhi kam umar hon gi. Muhtarma shireen Jinnah farmati hain k “bachpan ki shadi thi or nikah ke bad “amarbi” yani dulhan ki rukhsati nahi hui thi or wo Karachi nahi aai thin.” Nikah ke bad dulha jab Karachi wapis aae to 5th class ke imtehanat khatam ho chuke the or galiban usi madarsa ki usi jamat me dakhil ho kar parhne pr amada nahi hue. Ye bhi aglab hai k Muhammad ali Jinnah ke walid Jinnah ponja ne apne bête ko angrezi mahol se manos karne ke lye charch mission school me talim dilana munasib samjha ho jahan se pehle gurez kya tha. Sindh madarsa ke record se wazah hota hai k qaid ne 5th class me dobara dakhla nahi lya wo mehnati the zahin the or un ke andar khud aetamadi thi is lye unhon ne charch mission high school ka rukh kya. 
Charch mission school ke angrez principle is honehar or zahin talib ilm se itne mutasir hue k unhon ne 8 may 1862 ko 6th class me dakhil kar lya. Is honehar talib ilm ne angrezi me dastakhat kye or apna nam Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai likha. Wazah rahe k pehle sindh madarsatul islam me qomiyat ke khane me un ke nam ke samne “khuja” likha tha lekin charch mission school me pehli bar khud “muhammadan” likhwaya. In dono schools me Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ka nam puri fees ada karne wale talib ilm ki hesiyat se numaya tor pr darj hai.
Yahan ekwazahat boht zarori hai. wo ye k in dono schools ke register me qaid ki tarikh pedaish 20 october 1875 likhi hui hai.in registers ke aks me ye bat bhi numaya hai k ye register ek muqadma me pesh kye gae the. Jaj ne muqadma no 11, 1896 me apne fesle me likha k “meri rae ye nahi hai k mada alia (Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai) ka October me paida hona maqol shabhat se bala qarar pa kar sabit ho jae. Fazil jaj ki ye rae saf tor pr batati hai k Muhammad ali Jinnah ki tarikh pedaish 20 october qarar dena maqol shabhat se bala har giz nahi tha.ab dosri tarikh 25 december reh jati hai jo qaid ne passport me likhwai. October ki tarikh pr jo shuba jaj ne zahir kyat ha wo yaqinan qaid ke samne bhi tha.isse zahir hai k 25 december 1876 ka amomi andaz se taslim shuda matsor hona bila sabab har giz nahi. Accedmy teqan se qata nazar or muhqiq ki azadi ke bawajud me zati tor pr is fesle ko or is amomi taslim shuda tarikh ko durst samjhta hon. 

Qaid ki farm Farm of quaid

Jinnah ponja ne 1892 ke awail me eknayi farm ki bunyad rakhi jis ka nam unhon ne “masers Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai” rakha or is farm ka malik apne bare bête muhmmad ali jin ko banaya. Ahmed alijinnah abhi sif 6 sal ke the.is farm ne 2500 rupes maliyat ki machliyan englistan bhejin or 10,000 rupes maliyat ki chaina rawana kin.englistan me in raqom ko hasil karne or karobar ki baqaida karwai London me shuru karne ki zimedariyan Muhammad ali ke supurd huin. Chunancha wo jab englistan pohnche to unhon ne raqom wasol kar ke ek hisa apne walid ke pas bheja or baqi khud apni zaroriyat ke lye rakh lya.  

London Rawanngi / Journey of london

Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ne 31 october 1892 ko charch mission high school ki 6th jamat chori or january1893 me englistan rawana ho hae. Englistan jane ka pura ahtamam kya gya tha. Ek to 7 samundar par ka safar dosre Karachi or London ke mosomon ka farq garam mulk se sard mulk jana tha englistan ki sardi ka hare k ko ilm tha. Englistan me kese libas ki zarorat thi? Is se bhi ye gharana be khabar nahi tha. Yahan to un ka un ke walid ka or dosre ahal shehar jo am libas thaw o bides ke lye mozo nahi samjha ja sakta tha. Bête ki sheet or saholat ke lye waldain ne garam se garam libas tayar tarwae ho ge. Jin ki Karachi jesi mutadal abo hawa me zyada zarorat na thi. Ye bhi mumkin hai k unhon ne dhila dhala pajama or “dagla” jo Karachi ke mosam me pehna jata tha usi libas me bête ko rawana kya ho or ye bhi mumkin hai kangrezi waza ke coat ya overcoat banwae hon. Qarin qayas to yahi hai k is nojawan tajir ko apne riwaiti libas me London ke lye tijarti or tarikhi safar pr rawana kya gya. 
Behre hal is sal englistan me sardi gair mamoli pari thi or mutadal or garam abo hawa ke elaqon se jolog wahan gae the un ke lye ye sal boht parishani ka tha. Muhammad ali daraz qad or boht duble patle the. Sardi bardasht karne ki un me yun bhi salahiyat na thi phir aese thande mulk me wo pehli martaba pohnche the. Yahan bareazam me unhon ne khawah kitne hi karake ki sardi dekhi ho London ki sardi is se kahin barh charh ke thi. Na wahan ke logon se un ke taluqat the balke kisi se bhi wahan un ki waqfiyat na thi. Wahan ki kehar bhi un ke lye bilkul nayi chez thi. Suraj mahinonnazar na ata.  Din me bhi masnoi roshni ki jati. Mosam or mahol insane ka khud bhi bara mualim hai. akhir kar kisi na kisi tarha unhon ne wahan ke mosam or halat se munasibat paida kar li. Tahum un ko ye bat sari umar yad rahi k englistan ki shaded sardi, kehar or na manos fiza ne un ko kitna parishan kya tha. Unhon ne englistan me halat ke taqaze or apni tabiyat ki nifasat pasandi or mulki fashion ke mutabiq behtar se behtar bilas banwae or pehne. bad me to un ki khush poshaki apne mulk me zarbul misil ban gai thi.   
Englistan me no umar Muhammad ali Jinnah ki karobari koshishen in parishaniyon ki waja se nakam rahen jin ka samna Karachi me un ke walid ko karna par raha tha. Yani in maqasid or mashagil ki rah taqriban kat chuki thi jin ke lye wo Karachi se bheje gae the. Unhon ne walid ko likha k mujhe London hi me rehne ki ijazat dijye ta k me yahan qanon ki talim hasil kar lon. Zahir hai k englistan ja kar yun hi wapas ajana bara khasara tha. Chunancha is nojawan tajir ko ek no umar talib ilm ki hesiyat se englistan me rehne ki ijazat mil gai lekin no umar Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ka jo talimi meyar us waqt tha is ki waja se berestry ki talimi idare me dakhla hasil karna mumkin na tha.lehaza un ko berestry ki talim hasil karne ki ahliyat or darsgah kea hate me qadam rakhne ki salahiyat paida karne ke lye ek ibtadai imtehan dena para. Ye goya dakhle ka imtehan tha. 
Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai metric pas na the.6th me the to charch mission school chor dya.us zamane me metric 10th ko nahi balke 7th ko kehte the. Abhi metric ke mayar talim me 1 ½ sal ki kami thi is lye unhon ne bari mehnat se is ki tayari ki. Ye imtehan may 1893 me hone wala tha or waqt boht kam tha. Unhon ne sal 1 ½ sal ki is talimi kami ko chand hafton me pura kya. Is mukhtasar mudat me un ki lagan azm or hosle ne un ki madad ki, or mehnat bhi khob ki. Tayari ke bad wo is (ibtadai) imtehan me sharik hue or kamyab ho gae. Allah mehnat karne walon ko mehnat ka samar zaror deta hai. yun qaid ki mehnat or zahanat ki ek bari missal hamare samne ati hai. 5 july 1893 ko “linkanzin” me un kodakhla mil gya or register me “Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai” ka nam darj hua. Qaid ke safar englistan ke silsile me aksar kitabon me ye tazkira ata hai k donel shipping company ke ek angrez manager Fredrik kraft ke mashware se Muhammad ali Jinnah ko berestry ke lye englistan bhejne ka fesla Jinnah ponja ne kya tha. Lekin chan bin se malom hua k1890 or us ke bad ke dastawizat me us company me is nam ka kahin ata pata nahi milta is lye munasib hai kis nam ko ab qaid ke tazkire me koi jaga na di jae. Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ka ye safar englistan aslan qanon ki talim hasil karne ke lye nahi tha balke wo apne walid ke karobar ke silsile me ek maqsad le kar gae the. Jesa k pehle darj hua is maqsad ke lye wahan kaam karne ki koi sorat baqi nahi rahi thi. Agar karobar me kamyabi ho gai hoti to yaqinan un ko ibtada me qanon ki taraf tawaja karne ki fursat na milti or agar wo berestry ki talim ke lye rawana kye jate to metric ki talim mukamal karne ke bad englistan rawana kye jate. Behre hal London me jab fursat hi fursat nazar aai to Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ne ek bara fesla kya or is ke lye apne walid se ijazat hasil ki. Ab rahi bat k qaid ne qanon hi ki talim hasil karne ka fesla q kya. Wo or koi rah bhi ikhteyar kar sakte the. Ilm ki be shumar rahen un ke lye khuli hui thin. “tasil go” kar ke BA ki talim hasil kr sakte the. Imkanat ko mukhtalif ho sakte hain lekin ek to ye k London rawana hone se pehle shehar Karachi me jo muqadma baziyan unhon ne apne hi gharane or bartanvi gair bartanvi companies or dosre afrad ke darmiyan dekhi thin. in ka asar un ke zehan pr zaror raha ho ga. Phir ye bhi mumkin hai k un ki tabiyat me jo azadi thi us ne un ko is raste pr jane se roka ho jis pr jane ke bad wo kisi ki mulazimat ikhteyar karne pr majbor hote. Azadi ki zindagi basar karne ki ek rah to wahi thi jise tijarat kehte hain jis me khud apni zahanat mehnat or azadana fesle se admi kaam leta hai balke is rah pr apne walid ki pervi me un ke qadam khud bakhud barh chuke the magar karobar ke khasare ne age ka rasta band kar dya. Phir jis London me wo mojud the wahan un ke beshtar hum watan nojawan yani bareazam hind ke mukhtalif shehron or elaqon ke afrad qanon ki talim hasil karne ke lye gae the use milne julne or apne zati mushahide mutale or rujhanat ki bina pr dosri azad rah unko berestry ki nazar aai. Unhon ne mehsos kya k berestry ka pasha aesa hai jo mulazimat ki tamam uljhanon or matehti ki tamam pechidgiyon se pak hai. 
London me berestry ki talim ke lye 4 idare the jin ki “in” kehte the or ab bhi hain. Un ke “linkanz in’ me q dakhla lya? Is ki waja qaid ne khud 25 january 147o sindh bar association karachi me sirat pak pr taqrir karte hue batai hai k “jab main qanon ki talim hasil karne ke lye gya to London ke charo “ins” dikhane ke lye gaide mujhe le kar chala k in me se kisi ek ko apne lye pasand kar lo main “linkanz in” pohncha to wahan mujhe us ki diwar pr ek bari khush rang tehrir or naqosh nazar aae. Main ne pucha k ye kya hai to gaid ne batayak ye “fresco” hai jis me dunya ke tamam bare bare muqnanon (qanon dene walon) ken am darj hain. Main ne pucha k is fehrist me sab se pehle kis ka nam hai gaid ne jawab me kaha. Azim muqanan Muhammad (S.A.W) ka. Bas main ne wahin dakhla lene ka fesla kar lya”. Ye thi qaid ki pegamber islam (S.A.W)b se muhabbat or aqidat ki ek bari missal. 
Muhammad ali Jinnah india council act 1892 ke nafaz ke bad London pohnche the. Usi sal ke wast me dada bhai noroji ki election me kamyabi or bartanvi parliament ke pehle Hindustani rukun muntakhan ho jane se bareazam ke un tulba me bara josh or kharosh tha jo London me muqim the is se qudrati tor pr qaid ko bhi dosre sal London pohnchne pr dilchaspi paida hui. Magar ye kehna durst nahi k muhmmad ali Jinnah bhai ne dada bhai noroji ke election ki meham me hisa lya tha ya London me jab ye election hua tha or darul ulom me dada bhai noroji ne 9 august 1892 ko taqir ki thi to us waqt wo darul ulom ki “visitor gallery” me bethe ye taqrir sun rahe the (jesa k fazil musanif hekter Bolitho ne apni kitab “Jinnah bani Pakistan” me likha hai) us waqt to wp apne Karachi ke charch mission me bethe apne ustad ka lecture sun rahe the.
Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai puri dilchaspi or diljami se berestry ki talim hasil karne me manhamk rahe lekin kabhi kabhi jab walida yad ajatin to afsurda bhi ho jate. Wo un ko bimar chor kar gae the. Muhtarma shiren Jinnah ka bayan hai k wo abhi London hi me the k maa ka inteqal ho gya. Is saneha ki khabar un ko hui to na sirf ye k boht ranjida or gamgin hue balke phot phot kar roe or 1894 ki chutiyon me chand hafton ke lye Karachi aae. Un ke walid ke karobar me aesa khasara hua tha k diwalia ho jane ki nobat agai thi. Qaid jab Karachi se phir London wapas pohnche to unhon ne apne akhrajat ki az sar no mansuba bandi ki or apni jae rehaish bhi tabdil kar li. Ye 1895 ke awail ki bat hai. qaid ne ab nasbatan kam kharch elaqe “kingastan” me aqamat ikhteyar ki jahan Hindustani talib ilmo ko ba kifayat jaga mil jaya karti thi. 35 rasal road London ki is aqamat gah pr county council ne joy ad gari takhti (plak) lagai hai us pr likha hai. “qaid - e – azam Muhammad ali Jinnah bani Pakistan (1876 – 1948) ne is jaga 1895 me qayam kya tha.” Wo us zamane me wahan apni talimi masrofiyat se waqt bacha kar kuch kaam bhi karne lage the or is tarha apni amadni ka zarya bhi talash kar lya tha. Magar kya kaam tha is ki chan bin zarori hai. shekpearin dramatic club me kaam karne ki chand shahadaten mili hai jo mazid tehqiq talab hain. 
Berestry ki talim ke akhir sal Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ne linkanz in ki council se ye darkhast ki k mera nam ainda “Muhammad ali Jinnah” likha jae or “bhai” ka lafz is se hazf kar dya jae. Un ke walid ne jo farm qaim thi us ka nam bhi “mesers Muhammad ali Jinnah thai” tha or wo Muhammad ali Jinnah bhai ken am se yad kye jate the. Council ne un ki ye darkhast april 1896 ko manzor ki or un ke nam se ye khandani riwaiti lafz bhai hazf kar dya gya. Phir 4 din bad un ka yahi nam berestry ki hesiyat se shaa hua or yun wo Muhammad ali Jinnah ya M A Jinnah ho gae. 
1896 ke wast me jab nojawan berestor Muhammad ali Jinnah apni talim mukamal kar lene ke bad London se watan wapas aae to us waqt tak un ka gharana mali parishaniyon ke sabab Karachi se bambai muntaqil ho chukka tha jahan amarbai ka inteqal ho gya. Wo bhi bambai pohnche or wahan “apolo hotel” me room no 110 karae pr le kar aqamat ikhteyar ki or 24 august 1896 ko high court ke register me nam darj hua. 
Berestry ka pasha bari mehnat or mushaqat or azmaishon ka pasha hai. mahinon balke barson ek berestor ko bagair amadni ke bhi kaam karna parta hai. ye bara sabar azma marhala hota hai or is marhale pr bare tahamul ki zarorat hoti hai. berestor Jinnah ka dil azam or himat or hosle se labrez tha. Behre qimat un ko is rah me kamyab ho kar aage barhna tha. Agarcha kais al tak becheni ser kamyabi ki rah dekhni pari lekin kisi marhale pr bhi us ke hosle me kami nahi aai. Wo London se wapas aae the to is ke lye tayar ho kar aae the. Unhon ne London hi me bari kifayat shari se zindagi basar karna shuru kar di thi or fursat nikal ke jo digar kaam kye the or bachat kit hi wo raqam London se apne sath le kar aae the. Mehnat mushaqat ke is dor me jab un ki koi amadni nahi thi to wahi waqam un ke kaam aai. 
Berestor Jinnah baqaidgi ke sath adalat me bhi jate rahe or apne daftar ya chamber me bhi hama tan mashgol rahe. Un ka chamber fort area me waqa tha jo un ki rehaish gah se koi mile bhar ke fasle pr tha. Wo chamber tak har roz pedal jate the. 1898 ke awakir tak jab un ke halat behtar ho gae to Apollo Bandar k eek flet me muqim ho gae jahan unhon ne ek mulazim bhi rakh lya. Is mulazim ka nam wasant tha. Ye ek achot tha. Qaid ka ye achot mulazim 1940 tak un ke sath raha. Muhtarma shireen Jinnah farmati hain. “wasant ek yad gar character tha. Wo us waqt mulazim hua tha jab bhai jan bilkul nojawan the. Wasant watai anparh tha lekin barson un ke sath rehte rehte itna tarbiyat yafta ho gya tha k wo un ki almari se muqadmat ke zarori kagzat, maslen, brief or hawale ki kitaben tak le ata tha. Wo ye sab kese karta tha hamen to jadu hi lagta tha. Burhape me wasant hamare ghar ka jese ek fard ho gya tha koi shakhs is ko dant nahi sakta tha or hum logon ke mamle me to jo kuch wok eh deta thabas wahi akhiri bat hoti thi. Wasant ne jab burhape ki waja se mulazimat chori to bhai jan ne use chalet waqt boht kuch dya or us ke gao “due” me is ke lye ghar bhi banwaya ye sab us ki tawil shandar khidmat ka sila tha or us ki qadar dani thi. 
Darasal qaid shuru hi se insaniyat ki azmat or logon ki khud dari ke qail the. Ye un ki insane dasti ki missal hai k unhon ne wo sab kuch kya jis ke wo qanonan to paband na the magar ikhlaqi pabandi jo khud un ki taba slim ne un ke zehen or fikar pr aid kar rakhi thi wo sab se bala or aham thi.     
Yahi 1898 hai jab musalmanan bareazam ke bare rehnuma sir syed ahmed khan ka inteqal hua or nojawan berestor Muhammad ali Jinnah ne apni amli zindagi me qadam rakha or phir ahista ahista bari mutanat, zahanat or istehkam ke sath aage barhe. Isi sal nojawan berestor ne bahesiyat qanon dan apne ilmor zahanat ka pehla muzahira is muqadme me kya jo bartanvi company ki taraf se un pr or un ke walid pr dair kya gya tha. Unhon ne apne walid ko qanoni mashware de kar usi sal muqadme ki pervi ke lye Karachi rawana kya or berestor Muhammad ali Jinnah ki qanoni sujh bujh ne bartanvi company ko shikanje me kas lya. Wo is qadar parishan hui k qanoni qanoni giraft se bachne ke lye hazarhan rupee ke dawe or un ki wasoli se dastbardar ho kar sirf chand 100 rupee pr masalehat kar li. Nojawan berestor pr shuru hi se salah pasandi, mufahimat or masalehat ka rujhan galib nazar ata hai jis ka sab se bara namuna usi pehle muqadme me pehli bar samne aya.un ki tabiyat me marat bakhshi mojud thi nez wokisi ki ruswai se lutf andoz hone ke bhi qail na the.
Berestor Muhammad ali Jinnah ko hakumat bambai ne 3 may 1900 ko arzi tor pr presidency ministered muqarar kyat ha. Us zamane me kisi shakhs ka presidency ministered ho jana boht bari bat thi oe wo bhi ek junior berestor ka magar isi sal kam or besh 6 mah bad berestor Jinnah ne ministered ke ohde se aledgi ikhteyar kar li. Un ki tabai huriyat pasandi ka taqaza yahi tha. Phir hakumat ke mehakma qanon ki taraf se mustaqil mulazimat pesh ki gai to unhon ne us ko aqabol na kya.

Yahi qaid ki zindagi ka nuqta inqalab hai.
That is the actually point of view of his lif

Wo agar is shoba zindagi ko qabol kar lete to aage chal kar shayad adalat adlia ke chief justice ban jate. Council ya fedrel court ke kisi ala ohde pr faiz ho jate magar phir unhen dunya ke naqshe pr ek nayi mumlikat islamia ke bani or farman rawa banne ka moqa muyasar na ata. Yahi keh sakte hain k ye qudrat ke khel hain. Jis ne un koaesi aesi mulazimaton ki taraf bhi ragib na hone dya. 
Jis zamane me berestor Jinnah abhi presidency ministered nahi bane the abhi apni berestry ki bunyaden mazbot karne ki jadujehad me masrof the be inteha mehnat or mushaqat kar rahe the or abhi un ki koshishen bar awar nahi hui thi usi zamane me Jinnah ponja ko bête ki shadi kar dene kifikar satane lagi. Bilakhir bête ki rae le kar unhon ne apne baradar nasbati qasim mosa ki sahab zadi Fatima qasim ke lye beretor Jinnah ka pegam bheja. Fatima qasim nojawan berestor kimamon zad behan thin sehat mand, gori chiti, buland bala qad, sunhere bal, bhori ankhen, khubsurat gharane ki khubsurat beti ghar hi me mojud thi lekin qasim mosa ne ye pegam qabol nahi kya. Pegam qabol na karne ke silsile me 2 baten kahi jati hain. Ek to ye k Jinnah ponja ka karobar khatam ho chukka tha. Dosre berestor Jinnah abhi apni wakalat ke ibtadai or kathin marhalon se guzar rahe the. Un ka mustaqbil wazah nahi tha or qasim mosa ki sahab zadi ne dolat or sarwat ki agosh me parwarish pai thi. Wo aese mahol me kese reh sakti thi jahan nazo nam ab baqi nahi raha tha. Dosre lafzon me mashi mushkilat is rishte me are aain. 
Dosri riwayat muhtarma zulekha m h syed ki hai jo qaid ke nanhyali khandan se taluq rakhti hain wo bayan karti hain k”berestor Jinnah ke bare me ye aam khayal tha k wo aga khani maslik se koi taluq nahi rakhte or qasim mosa aga khan ke bare wazir the lehaza dushwari ye pesh aai k wo apni beti ko apne mislik se bahar kese biyah den. Aga khan ke bare wazir hone ki waja se un pr jo zimedariyan aid hoti thin wo un ki rah me is qadar hail huin k wo apne sage bhanje ka pegam apni beti ke lye qabol na kar sake.”
Zyada qarin qayas yahi dosri riwayat nazar ati hai. khud berestor Jinnah ki sari zindagi usi ki shahadat deti hai k wo sirf musalman the or kisi mehdud maslik se apne aap ko wabasta karne pr amada nahi hue. Is inkar se chahe wo mashi mushkilat ki waja se ho ya maslik kibunyad pr nojawan berestor ke dil ko thes zaror pohnchi ho gi. Jis ke bad unhon ne ekarsa tak shadi ka khayal hi nahi kya balke mashi mushkilat ka zabardast muqabla kya or lakhon rupee kamaya or sath hi maslik ke jhamele se bhi hamesha apne aap ko alag rakha. 
Jinnah ponja ki zindagi ki sab se bari zimedari ab ye thi k “rehmat bi” or “maryam bi” 2 bari betiyon ki shadi ho jae or wo in faraiz se sabakdosh ho jaen. Yahi salt ha k sab se bari beti rehmat bi ke lye kalkata ke mashor tajir qasim jamal ka rishta aya jo suni khuja the.jinnah ponja ne rishta ko pasand kya tahum un ko apne susrali halqe ki taraf se kuch maslik ki uljhan ka andesha tha. Is moqa pr nojawan berestor ne bap ke dil ko taqwiyat pohnchai or is rishte ko boht Mubarak qarar dya. Akhir bap ne bête ke mashwara qabol kar ke fesla kya or ye shadi kher or khobi ke sath anjam pa gai.lekin is bat pr Jinnah ponja ke taluqat apni susral walon se bhi khatam ho gae or wo aga khani halqe se bhi alag kar dye gae.
Jinnah ponja ki tabiyat 1902 me zyada kharab rehne lagi to unhon ne apni dosri beti ki shadi bhi apni zindagi me kar deni chahi ta ka ye khushi bhi dekh len or jawan berestor ne bap ki ye khushi bhi puri ki. Unhon ne is shadi ka ahtamam us waqt kya jab Jinnah ponja bister pr par gae the. Unhon ne maryam bi ki shadi bambai ke mashor tajir abdin pir bhai se kar di. Ye bhi suni khuja the. Ye sare fesle berester Jinnah ne kye or puri tawaja se ye sari taqribat khush aslobi ke sath injam dye. 
Jinnah ponja ne 17 april 1902 ko inteqal kya to gharane ki sari zimedariyan barae rast nojawan berestor ke kandhon pr again. Wahi ghar me sab se bare the. Ahmed ali Jinnah shirren Jinnah or Fatima Jinnah ki dekh bhal talim or tarbiyat or shadi biyah ke faraiz sab ahista ahista unhi ne anjam dye. Fatima Jinnah ko bandra canont bording school me talim ke lye dakhil kya. Ahmed ali Jinnah ko anjuman islam me bheja. Shireen Jinnah ki shadi ka masla dar pesh tha is ke sare intezamat kye or sir karim baronet ke gharane me karim jafri bhai se un ki shadi hui jo aga khani the is tarha khandani or gharelo faraiz se faragat pa kar wo apni berestry me hama tan mashgol ho gae or puri yaksoi ke sath kaam karte rahe.

Islami qawanin ka mutala / Study of Islamic rule

Jab Muhammad ali Jinnah apni talib ilmi ke zamane me London me muqim the ye 1894 ki bat hai to previ council k eek fesle ne musalmanon ke lye masla “waqf aliul olad” pr zarb kari lagai thi. Is fesle ke khilaf musalmanon me shaded gam or gusa or hejan tha. Is fesle or us ke qanoni asarat pr qanon ke talib ilm ki hesiyat se Muhammad ali Jinnah ki nazar yaqinan rahi ho gi. Musalmanonke jazbat ki shidat se bhi wo agah the phir wo khud berestor ho kar ubhre to un ki nazar is masle ke nashib or faraz pr rahi ho gi. Unhon ne is ka mazid mutala yaqinan quran or sunat ki roshni me kya ho ga or bad ke waqyat shahid hain k unhon ne ye sab kuch kyat ha. Bambai me unhon ne jab berestry ka agaz kya or un ki qanoni nakta sanjiyan, moshgafiyan or fani barikiyan apne johar dikhane lagin to us ka charcha hone laga. Qaid ne khud farmaya hai k “1902 hi me un ko 2000 rupee se zyada amadni hone lagi thi.” Waqf aliul olad ke masle pr to wo is qadar tayar the k shayad un ko moqa milne kid air thi.

Siyasi or parlimani zindagi / Political and parliamentary life

Waqyat batate hain k 1902 me jab kalkata me congres ka salana ajlas hua to unhen is islami qanon or bartanvi adalati karwai pr izhar khayal ka pura moqa mila tha chunancha unhon ne waqf aliul olad ki tajwiz pr jo taqrir kit hi wo un ki awalin mazhabi or siyasi taqrir thi jo kisi plet form se hui. All india muslim league us waqt tak qaim nahi hui thi us ki bunyad unhi dino 30 december 1902 ko Dhaka me rakhi gai thi.

Muslim education counfrence musalmanon ki sab se bari anjuman mojud to thi magar wo sirf education yani talimi thi. Congress ki hesiyat ek siyasi plet form kit hi or musalmanon ka koi siyasi plet form mojud nahi tha. Aal india national congres ke nam se ek siyasi jamat angrezon ne qaim kit hi or bare bare angrez is ke shuru ke ajlas me sharik bhi hote rahe the balke wahi is ki sadarat bhi karte the or is ki karwai pr puri tawaja rakhte the. Musalmanon ne apne is mazhabi or qanoni masla “waqf aliul olad” ko isi congres ke siyasi plet form pr la kar ye wazah kya k ye masla siyasi bhi hai or is nayi awaz se sara bareazam gonj utha. Is ajlas me nojawan berestor ne “muslim waqf aliul olad” ke elawa qomi “talim” or “self government” yani hakumat khud mukhtari pr bhi aham taqriren kin. In taqriron or un ki shan khatabat or andaz peshkash ne ahal fikar or nazar ki tawaja apni taraf khinchi or har khas or aam me un ka charcha shuru ho gya. 1902 ki is congress ke ijtama ki sadarat dada bhai noroji ne ki thi. Mister “alen octaven hayom” us ke gernal secretary the or unhon ne hi 1885 me congres qaim kit hi or jab se brabar us ke kalide ohde pr faiz chale arahe the. Congres ke joint secretary gopal kirshan ghokhle or d e vocha bhi mojud the berestor Muhammad ali Jinnah ajlas ke rehnumaon me sab se kam umar the or un ki umar thek 30 sal ki thi wo us dor ke umar rasida jahandida or manjhe hue siyasat danon ki sif me pehli martaba dekhe gae the. Yun to wo apni siyasi zindagi ke agaz hi se sif awal me nazar aae tahum un ki shan or shokat or zehni or fikri imteyaz ke phelo isi plet form pr awal awal kalkata me numayan hue.

LAHORE HIGH COURT DECLARE 'SIGNAL-FREE CORRIDOR' PROJECT ILLEGAL

The Lahore High court (LHC) on Friday 17.04.2015 barred city Development Authority (LDA) to begin the Signal-Free corridor Project on Jail Road till holding of Local body (LB) polls.

A full bench headed by Justice Syed Manzoor Ali Shah held hearing of the case.

There were number of petitions filed by different person against LDA Signal Free Corridor Project. The petitioner, Azhar Siddique in one petition said that underneath the Article 140-A of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, the LDA is not having power to begin any project while not authorization of the district administration.

Whereas the government’s counsel, Barrister Khawaja Harris said that the LDA is performing its duties inside the legal boundaries. The project aims at providing higher transportation facilities to the folks, he added.

However, the court annulled the choice of beginning a project and ordered the authorities involved to wait till holding of local body elections. The LHC also ordered that to initiate legal proceedings against LDA officers for beginning a project while not getting No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Environmental Protection Department under Punjab Environmental Protection Act, 1997.

SAMPLE OF RENT / LEASE DEED

SAMPLE OF RENT / LEASE DEED

This deed of Lease made, entered into and executed at __________________ this ______ day of ____________ month, ________, and between _______________________________, son of _______________________________, aged about ________ years, residing ________________________________________________, hereinafter called the “LESSOR’ which terms shall mean and include, wherever the context so admits, his heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of the one part and _______________________________, son of _______________________________ aged about ________ years, residing at ________________________________________________, hereinafter called “LESSEE’ which terms shall mean and include wherever and whenever the context so admits, his heirs, executors, administrators legal representatives and assigns of the other part.

Whereas house, ground, and premises _______________________________________________, more particularly described in the schedule hereunder belongs to the Lessor herein.  And whereas the lessee approached the lessor for execution of a lease deed in his favour, one of the shops situated in the _______ floor of the said premises and which for the purpose of denomination has been numbered as Shop No______________________(Private Mark) offering to pay a sum of Rs. ________ /- (Rupees _______________________________________only) per month as rent without default for a period of __________ months (____ months) from ______ day of __________________ the lessor has agreed to the said offer made by the lessee.

NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The period of lease shall be 11 months commencing from _____________ (dd-mm-yyyy) to ______________ (dd-mm-yyyy).
2. The property leased is shop No________and shall be leased for a sum of Rs. ________/- (Rupees _______________________________________ only) per month exclusive of the payment of electricity and other charges.
3. The lessee has paid a sum of Rs. ______________/- (Rupees ______________________________ only) as advance for the tenancy and the said sum is repayable or adjusted only at the end of the tenancy on the lease delivery vacant possession of the shop let out, subject to deductions, if any, lawfully and legally payable by the lessee under the terms of this lease deed and in law.
4. The rent for every month shall be payable on or before _______ of the succeeding month.
5. The lessee shall pay electricity charges to the Electricity Board every month without fail.
6. The lessor or his agent shall have a right to inspect the shop at any hour during the day time.
7. The Lessee shall use the shop let out duly for the business of General Merchandise and not use the same for any other purpose.  (The lessee shall not enter into partnership) and conduct the business in the premises in the name of the firm.  The lessee can only use the premises for his own business.
8. The lessee shall not have any right to assign, sub-let, re-let, under-let or transfer the tenancy or any portion thereof.
9. The lessee shall not carry out any addition or alteration to the shop without the previous consent and approval in writing of the lessor.  The lessor shall be entitled to all the benefits and improvements so made.
10. . If necessary the lessee shall white wash and paint and carryout minor repair to the said shop let out at his own cost.  Any damages to the property should be corrected by lessee.
11. . The lessee on the expiry of the lease period of _______ months shall hand over vacant possession of the ceased shop peacefully or the lease agreement can be renewed for a further period on mutually agreed terms.
12. . The lessee shall pay the monthly rent and amenity charges and if default being committed in the payment of such rent, etc. even for a period of a single month or in default of any of the terms or conditions the lease shall come to an end. On such default the lessor shall have a right on entry and obtain delivery of vacant possession.
13. . New lease agreements will be valid only after termination of this lease duly authorized by the lessor.
14. . Upon determination of this Agreement, to dismantle, remove and take away all the items of work, things, articles, equipments, installations of the lease pursuant to the renovation work done by the Lessee on the said premises and hand over to the Lessor the said premises in good order and in the same layout, as far as possible, reasonable wear and tear, force majeure and unforeseen calamities excepted.
15. . ________________________________________________________________________________
16. ________________________________________________________________________________
17. . It is hereby agreed that the tenancy shall be terminable by either party on giving _________ months notice.  The boundaries are given for the entire house.

In witness whereof the lessor and the lessee above named have here into set a subscribed their respective hands and names the day and year first above written in the presence of.

LESSOR                                                                                       LESSEE

WITNESS:

1.

2.

SAMPLE OF DIVORCE DEED

SAMPLE OF DIVORCE DEED

This DIVORCE DEED is made at Lahore, on this _____ day of July 2012.

Know all man by these present that I, ____________ son of ____________, Muslim, Adult, Holding CNIC No. ____________________, resident of House NO. ___________________________, Lahore, do here by declare and state as under:-

Whereas I was married with Mst. ________________ D/o. ________________, Muslim, Adult, Resident of __________________, with the consent of the both families, the marriage was solemnized on ____________ as per Islamic Rites at Lahore.

That, I tried my best to maintain the matrimonial tie but could not succeed to achieve happily matrimonial relation-ship due to our mental level, we could not understand each other, in view of above circumstances I reached at the conclusion that there is no possibility to live with her as a husband and wife in accordance with the prescribed limits of Al-Mighty Allah.

That, I have already announced verbal/oral divorce to her but she demanded/pressurized me that divorce will be announced in written, so on her demand I again announce divorce to her in the presence of two witnesses in writing:-

1.    I, _______________S/O. __________ DIVORCE TO MY WIFE MST. ____________ D/O. _____________.

2.    I, _______________S/O. __________ DIVORCE TO MY WIFE MST. ____________ D/O. _____________.

3.    I, _______________S/O. __________ DIVORCE TO MY WIFE MST. ____________ D/O. _____________.

I have paid Dowry amount of Rs. _________/- (Rupees _______________ only) in cash, according to the Nikahnama’s point No. 13.

That by virtue of this Divorce Deed I have released MST. ________________ from the matrimonial clutches and she will be at liberty to contract to marry with anyone after expiry of iddat period.

Whatever is stated above in Divorce Deed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.   

____________________      

EXECUTANT

Witnesses:-

1.      __________________        2.       __________________

          __________________                  __________________

          __________________                  __________________

          __________________                  __________________

CASE LAWS ON DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE

^{CASE LAWS ON DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE}

Citation Name : 2009 SCMR 857 SUPREME-COURT

Side Appellant : MAHMOOD HUSSAIN LARIK

Side Opponent : MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED

Art. 185(2)(d)(e) & (3)---Appeal to Supreme Court---Maintainability---No value could be given to the subject-matter of the appeals involving labour disputes, service cases, cases arising from the rent jurisdiction or family disputes where the main prayer was of restoration in service, eviction of the tenant on various grounds or dissolution of marriage /custody of minors respectively, although it may be that granting or refusing of the main prayer may result in some monetary benefit to any party to the dispute before the court of first instance and in an appeal---No direct appeal as of right could be filed in said matters as the first pre-condition could not be quantified---Appeal would be to the Supreme Court as of right if the matter was covered under Art.185(2)(d) & (e) of the Constitution and if the matter was not so covered then leave to appeal had to be sought from Supreme Court in terms of Art.185(3) of the Constitution---Principles.

……………………………………..

Citation Name : 2009 YLR 1139 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT-NWFP

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD FAISAL KHAN

Side Opponent : Mst. YUSRA ABID

S. S, Sched. & S.14---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Suit for dissolution of marriage , recovery of dower amount, past and future maintenance amount and recovery of dowry articles--Suit filed by the plaintiff having been decreed by the Family Court, defendant had challenged same in constitutional petition--Family Court, after taking pains and giving due weight to all the essential aspects of the case, decreed the suit of the plaintiff, allowing dower amount and maintenance allowance along with dowry articles etc.---Such findings of the Family Court having been given after thorough sifting the evidence on record, could not be said to be unwarranted in the eye of law---Keeping in view the decretal amount, defendant was required to avail his remedy before the Appellate Court by way of appeal---Having not availed the remedy of appeal under S.14 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, impugned judgment and decree of the Trial Court, which was free from any jurisdictional error, was not open to any interference in the exercise of extraordinary equitable discretionary constitutional jurisdiction of High Court.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 MLD 419 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT-NWFP

Side Appellant : Mst. NAGINA BIBI

Side Opponent : MUKHTAR HUSSAIN

Ss. 5, Sched, & 14---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Suit for recovery of dower amount, maintenance and dissolution of marriage ---Plaintiff filed suit for recovery of dower amount, maintenance and dissolution of marriage ---Both the Family Court and Appellate Court concurrently decreed the suit to the extent of recovery of dower amount and maintenance, but, her prayer for dissolution of marriage was dismissed---Plaintiff had assailed concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts below before High Court only to the extent of refusing her prayer for dissolution of marriage ---Effect---Record had revealed that there was difference in the temperaments of the parties---Relations inter se the parties had become so strained that it was not possible to have a happy union and to live within the limits prescribed by God and thus plaintiff was entitled to the decree for dissolution of marriage on the ground of Khula---Judgments and decrees of two Courts below were maintained only to the extent that decree for dissolution of marriage was granted to the plaintiff against defendant on the basis of Khula, subject to the condition that plaintiff would not claim the house decreed in her favour as she had claimed the Khula in lieu of the house.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 PLD 484 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD KALEEM ASIF

Side Opponent : ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

S. 5 & Sched.---Suit for dissolution of marriage on ground of `Khula'---Wife's statement before Court alleging her husband to be extremely cruel, due to which she could not continue to live with him---Validity---Wife was entitled to `Khula' without restoring benefit of dower to husband---Separate suit by wife for recovery of dower, if un paid, would be maintainable---Suit was decreed in circumstances----Principles.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 PLD 484 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD KALEEM ASIF

Side Opponent : ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Ss. 5, 7(2), Second Proviso & Sched.---Recovery of maintenance and dower claimed in separate suit, but not claimed by wile in earlier suit for dissolution of marriage ----Validity---Non-filing or separate filing of suit for dissolution of marriage would not bar joining of remaining causes of action in one suit---Purpose of permitting parties to join various causes of matrimonial disputes in one suit would be to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and advance cause of convenience of parties and courts--Principles.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 YLR 1451 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : MOHSIN ALI

Side Opponent : ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FAISALABAD

S. 5 Sched. & S.14---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Suit for dissolution of marriage , recovery of maintenance allowance, recovery of dower money and recovery of dowry articles---Family Court decreed suits filed by the plaintiff for her maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs.3000 per month for her Iddat period, maintenance allowance for minor son at the rate of Rs.4000 per month with 50% annual increase till the majority of the minor---Suit for recovery of gold ornaments given as dower was also decreed upto Rs.1,50,000 and dowry articles upto Rs.1,15, 000---Appellate Court reduced maintenance allowance of minor and appeal of the defendant to the extent of dower money and to the extent of recovery of dowry articles was partly accepted---Both courts below had arrived at the conclusion after considering the evidence produced by both the parties during the trial---Findings of the courts below were based on cogent reasons and were supported by the evidence on record, which could not be interfered with in constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Appellate Court had rightly fixed the price of dowry articles as per list produced by the plaintiff and no ambiguity was found in the same---No ground for interference in the findings of Appellate Court having been made out, constitutional petition was dismissed.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 YLR 1021 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : Wing Commander TIPU SULTAN KHAN

Side Opponent : RUBINA SAIRA ZAFFER

S. 5, Sched, Ss. 6 & 7---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Suit for dissolution of marriage on ground of `Khula'---Territorial jurisdiction of Family Court---Plaintiff filed suit for dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula in the Family Court at place `L'---Later on, when plaintiff went back to place 'I', defendant filed application in which jurisdiction of the Family Court at place 'L' was challenged, which application having been dismissed by the Family Court, defendant filed constitutional petition---Validity---Whether defendant was residing at place 'L' or 'I' was a factual controversy--- `Khula' was announced by the Family Court at place Z', and at that time jurisdiction of the Family Court at place `L' was not challenged---Such fact alone was enough to reject application of defendant--In order to avoid conflict of judgments, the suit for dissolution of marriage having been decided by one court at place 'L', all other ancillary issues also should have been decided by the same Court---Convenience of the lady/plaintiff litigant in family dispute should be given priority while deciding the place of adjudication of cases---Even otherwise, having .not challenged same earlier, subsequent objection, could not be appreciated.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 CLC 980 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : ABBAS AHMAD

Side Opponent : Mst. AYESHA AZIZ

Ss. 7 & 12-A---Matrimonial disputes---Expeditious disposal---Scope---To ensure expeditious disposal of suits relating to dissolution of marriage , family affairs and maintenance etc. West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, being a special statute has been enacted with such specific purpose---Family Court under S.12-A of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, should dispose of case within a period of six months from the date of its institution.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 CLC 905 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD BAKHSH MASOOD

Side Opponent : Mst. AYSHA MAI

S. 7(2)---Joinder of causes of action---Object and scope---Claim for various causes of action relating to matrimony of spouses are allowed to be joined together---Joinder is specifically mentioned with reference to the suit for dissolution of marriage but where suit for dissolution of marriage is not filed there can be no bar in joining rest of causes in one suit---Only purpose of permitting parties to join causes of matrimonial disputes in one suit, is to avoid multiplicity of proceedings as well as advancement of cause, convenience of parties and courts---It cannot be said that cause of matrimonial disputes can be joined together with a suit for dissolution of marriage but in other matters, parties should face rigours of multiplicity of litigation, treacherous inconvenience and agony of multiple litigation---If joinder is not to be permitted without suit for dissolution of marriage , the same renders whole legislation on such point useless.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 MLD 1042 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD AMIN

Side Opponent : FAUZIA IKRAM

Ss. 9 & 17A---Suit for dissolution of marriage , recovery of maintenance allowance and dowry articles---Closing of defence of defendant---Validity---Defendant was supposed to file written statement on the first date of his appearance but he had been making all efforts to frustrate progress of claims filed by his wife; he was given last opportunity to file written statement but he showed obduracy and on that account he was burdened with costs which were not paid---Defendant had therefore, lost his right of audience and order closing his defence was quite justified---Order passed for payment of interim maintenance allowance in terms of S.17A, West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 was also perfectly legal.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 MLD 962 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : AFTAB AHMAD

Side Opponent : JUDGE FAMILY COURT

Dissolution of marriage ---Changing of faith---Offer to accept Islam---Presumption---Lady was Christian by faith and had earlier married to a Christian but she embraced Islam and married a Muslim without getting formal divorce from her former Christian husband---Effect---After repudiating Christianity, lady embraced Islam, though there was nothing on record to show that she invited her Christian husband to accept Islam but it was established that it was in his knowledge that she had changed her faith and was living with a stranger i.e. Muslim husband---Since that former husband did not challenge their co-habitation in any forum, therefore, presumption would be in favour of lady that she offered embracing of Islam to her former husband but he refused to accept the same, thus marriage of respondent lady with the Christian husband stood dissolved.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 CLC 438 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : Mst. HAMIDA YASMIN

Side Opponent : AHMAD ALI

S. 5 & Sched.---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---dissolution of marriage ---Plaintiff (wife) earlier filed three suits for recovery of past maintenance, dowry articles and dower amount and on basis of compromise received dower amount---Later on the plaintiff filed suit for dissolution of marriage , which was decreed by the trial Court in lieu of payment of dower amount---Plea raised by the plaintiff was that suit for dissolution of marriage was filed on the grounds of bad character and cruel behaviour of defendant and plaintiff had never uttered word of "Khula"---Validity---Plaintiff had not joined the defendant (husband) after the suits were decreed and even before for which period she claimed the maintenance, which is evident that she did not allow the defendant to perform conjugal rights and insisted upon for dissolution of marriage ---Peculiar circumstances made the case demanded where plaintiff (wife) persistently and insistently claimed the decree for dissolution of marriage , she should have returned the amount received as Haq Mehr---Plaintiff was entitled for decree only on the basis of Khula, therefore, no illegality in the impugned judgment could be pointed out resulting into miscarriage of justice---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 YLR 1073 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SHOAIB

Side Opponent : Mst. FOUZIA

S. 5, Sched. & S.14---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition-Suits for dissolution of marriage , maintenance and return of Jahez/dowry articles---Petitioner had invoked constitutional jurisdiction of High Court assailing the orders of the courts below, whereby the suit for dissolution of marriage , maintenance and return of dowry articles was decreed---Counsel for the petitioner did not contest the matter in respect of dissolution of marriage but contended that there was gross misreading of evidence in respect of the entitlement of respondent of dowry articles as depicted in the dowry list---Family Court had decided the issues involved in favour of the respondent pertaining to the dissolution of marriage , return of the dowry articles and maintenance---Appellate Court through the impugned judgment decided the issue regarding the dowry articles in favour of the petitioner and maintained the quantum of award of maintenance by the Family Court to the respondents---Counsel for the petitioner had undertaken to pay the maintenance due to the respondents at the rate settled by the Family Court and had agreed to pay maintenance of minor--Impugned judgment did not call for interference in view of undertaking given by the petitioner's counsel.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 PLD 261 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Side Appellant : Ms. MAHNAZ BAKHTIAR

Side Opponent : FAROOKH R. MEHRI

S. 32---Petition for dissolution of marriage by wife on the ground that she had been deserted by the respondent without any reasonable cause for a period of three years within the meaning of S.32(g) of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936---Petitioner had averred that she had been living away from the respondent since 15 June, 2001, and that respondent had withdrawn all the obligations rested upon him---Delegates had opined that the petitioner was entitled to a decree for dissolution of marriage on the ground of desertion---When the respondent had extended no allegation and the delegates were also of the opinion that it would be impossible for the parties to live together under one roof, the petitioner had made out a case for the grant of divorce petition---Petition for divorce was granted by High Court in view of the consent of the respondent and the opinion of the delegates---Decree for divorce was allowed under S.32(g) of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 MLD 379 ISLAMABAD

Side Appellant : Syed SAJID ABBAS ZAIDI

Side Opponent : ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

S.5 & Sched.---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Khula, grant of---Principles---Suit for dissolution of marriage filed by wife was decreed in her favour by Family Court on the basis of Khula and the judgment was maintained by Lower Appellate Court---Validity---Held, evidence on record should establish that wife could not live with her husband any more, hence wife filed a suit for dissolution of marriage on the basis of Khula---Khula, in accordance with the Holy Quran and Sunnah could be granted, however the same was disliked not only by Allah Almighty but by society as a whole---If wife could not live with her husband any more and she found her husband intolerable then Khula could be granted in accordance with the principles of the Holy Quran and Sunnah, however she was not entitled to dower amount, therefore, amount of dower was waived in such case---High Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, modified the judgment and decree passed by Family Court---Petition was allowed accordingly.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2009 PCrLJ 263 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT

Side Appellant : KHALIL AHMED

Side Opponent : State

Ss. 11 & 10(3)---West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S.21(3)(a)---Appreciation of evidence---Main accused was competent to enter into contract of marriage with the alleged abductee after 90 days of the-receipt of the copy of the decree for the dissolution of marriage by the Chairman, as stipulated in S.21(3)(a) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964---Documentary evidence placed on record had destroyed the very foundation of the prosecution case as the abductee was the lawfully wedded wife of the main accused on the day of the alleged occurrence---Co-accused, real brother of main accused, therefore, could not be involved in committing Zina-bil-Jabr with his own sister-in-law and that too within the knowledge of main accused for whom a complex and protracted legal battle had been fought---Question of Zina-bil-Jabr did not arise when the abductee had been repeatedly admitting herself to be the wife of the main accused---Prosecution version which, in the entire trial had acquired a focal status, had not only to be plausible but coherent as well and built-in improbabilities could not be safely relied upon---Narration of facts should be natural and appealing to prudent persons---Conviction of accused could not possibly be based on questionable, unconvincing or a dubious story---Accused were acquitted in circumstances.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 CLC 1641 Supreme Court (AJ&K)

Side Appellant : TANVEER HUSSAIN

Side Opponent : NANI SULTANA

S. 5 & Sched.---Suit for dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula---Plaintiff had claimed dissolution' of marriage, alternatively on the ground of Khula---Plaintiff had deposed that she hated the defendant and alleged that her mother had been murdered by him---F.I.R. was lodged by the plaintiff and after the trial of the case, defendant had been convicted by the Trial Court---Plaintiff had stated that she could not maintain the limits ordained by the Almighty God and she requested that her marriage be dissolved on the basis of Khula---Validity---Basic object and purpose of the marriage was the creation of perfect and happy life and such a life could only be created, if there would be a mutual love and affection, but in the present case the relations between both the parties were so strained that there was no chance of reconciliation and it could safely be said that the parties were unable to maintain the limits ordained by the Almighty God, especially so when the mother of plaintiff had been murdered by the defendant and the plaintiff had been twice attacked by the defendant---Atmosphere of love could not be created, in such circumstances---Entire circumstances of the case had revealed that rift between the parties was much serious and there was no chance of reconciliation at all---Both courts below had rightly dissolved the marriage on the basis of Khula.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 SCMR 186 SUPREME-COURT

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD BASHIR ALI SIDDIQUI

Side Opponent : Mst. SARWAR JAHAN BEGUM

S. 5 & Sched.---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula---Parties were married in the year 1970---Nikahnama had provided that in case respondent/wife obtained Khula, she would have to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000 to the petitioner/husband; and if the petitioner would divorce the respondent, he would pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000 to her---Suit filed by respondent (wife) for obtaining dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula was finally decreed---Petitioner (husband) had contended that Family Judge as well as High Court had failed to take into account the Nikahnama-Contention of petitioner was that it was incumbent upon Family Court to award Rs.2,50,000 while granting decree by way of Khula in favour of petitioner---Contention of petitioner was absolutely frivolous as it was against the basic principle of law which required the parties to remain in marital tie in a peaceful and tranquil atmosphere and were not required to be bound by stringent conditions to remain in marriage bond.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 YLR 293 SHARIAT-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Side Appellant : BILAL HAMZA ABBASI

Side Opponent : WAZIR MUHAMMAD

Divorce---Mode---Islam did not prescribe any specific mode for dissolution of marriage ---Such was an overt act on the part of husband which could indicate a clear intention to annul the marriage to operate as a divorce---No particular form of words was prescribed for effecting a Talaq---If the words of 'Talaq' were clearly expressed, and very well understood as implying divorce, no proof of intention was required---Not necessary that divorce should be pronounced in the presence of the wife or even addressed to her.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 CLC 952 SHARIAT-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Side Appellant : Raja TAHIR BASHIR

Side Opponent : Mst. GULSHEEDA BIBI

S. 5, Sched.---dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula---Appeal to Shariat Court---Plaintiff filed suit for dissolution of marriage against defendant husband on ground of Khula, alleging that her husband was a cruel person who had made her life miserable by cruelty and ill-treatment; therefore she had developed hatred against him and that she could not live with him within the limits ordained by the Almighty Allah---Plaintiff further contended that she would not even want to see his face and she would prefer to die rather to live with him---All witnesses had supported the allegation of improper behaviour of defendant husband against plaintiff and separation of the spouses---Plaintiff had categorically stated before the court below that she had developed severe hatred against defendant and she could not live with him within the limits ordained by Almighty God---Before invoking power to annul marriage on ground of Khula, court must satisfy its conscience whether the spouses could live a life of love, affection, trust and harmony and if not, then it was better to break the hateful union---Wife, in the present case, was so adamant that she had expressed her hatred by deposing that she would prefer death instead of living with defendant---Islam did not force a woman to live sinful life; that was why right of Khula had been bestowed upon her by the Dictates of Holy Qur'an--Wife was not obliged to prove the fault of the husband, rather if it appeared from the record that relations of the spouses were strained beyond repair on account of fault of either party, whereupon wife had developed severe hatred against her husband, it was always advisable to dissolve the marriage---Marriage was rightly dissolved by the Family Court on ground of Khula, in circumstances---Husband had admitted that land, given by him to plaintiff wife in lieu of dower, was in his possession---Golden ornaments given to her at the time of marriage were sufficient consideration for grant of Khula as ordered by the Family Court.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 CLC 564 SHARIAT-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Side Appellant : Syed ABDUL QAYYUM SHAH

Side Opponent : Mst. TANVEER ANDLEEB

S. 5 & Sched.---Suit for dissolution of marriage on ground of 'Khula'---'Surah-Al-Baqrah' verse No.229 of the Holy Quran was the base and origin of legality of 'Khula'---Limits prescribed by Almighty Allah in said verse, would mean the direction to lead a happy life---Before dissolving the marriage on ground of 'Khula', the court must satisfy its conscience that every apprehension existed that spouses would not lead a happy life within the limits ordained by Almighty Allah and that wife wanted separation from her husband and she had to pay the consideration---If all such conditions were fulfilled, then no option was left for the court, except to annul the marriage and grant 'Khula' in favour of the wife.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 CLC 564 SHARIAT-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Side Appellant : Syed ABDUL QAYYUM SHAH

Side Opponent : Mst. TANVEER ANDLEEB

S. 5, Sched. & S.14---Suit for dissolution of marriage by wife against her husband on ground of cruelty, mental torture, non-payment of maintenance allowance and on ground of 'Khula', was decreed by the Family Court, whereas suit for restitution of conjugal right filed by husband against wife was dismissed---Validity---Contention of wife was that she was ousted from the house of her husband in March, 2004 and thereafter defendant did not provide her maintenance allowance---Suit having been filed on 3rd February 2005, the ground for decree of dissolution of marriage for non-providing of maintenance allowance for a period of two years was not available to her---Wife had also failed to prove, the factum of cruelty by convincing evidence; however, evidence on record had proved that spouses could not live together within the prescribed limits ordained by Almighty Allah and their relations were strained beyond repair---Wife had developed aversion and hatred against her husband and in no circumstances she was willing to live with him, in such state of affairs, it was better to annul the hateful union rather to compel wife to go back to her husband to lead an unhappy life---Husband had failed to prove as to whether he had given any jewelry, gift or other things to, his plaintiff wife---Family Court fixed the consideration of 'Khula', the dower received by plaintiff wife at the time of marriage ceremony---Impugned decision, did not suffer from any glaring defect or legal, infirmity and the dower money was an appropriate consideration for grant of 'Khula'---Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 YLR 2789 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT-NWFP

Side Appellant : MAHMOOD NOOR

Side Opponent : Mst. FIRASAT BIBI

S. 5 & Sched.---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Suit by wife for dissolution of marriage , maintenance and dower against husband---Appellate Court, after hearing both the parties, allowed the appeal of wife to the extent of grant of dissolution of marriage and half share of house mentioned in the Nikahnama to the wife in shape of dower and rest of the claims of wife were turned down---Validity---Appellate Court had properly scrutinized in great detail the evidence of both the parties and had given proper reasoning in partially accepting the appeal of the wife and no misreading, illegality or any irregularity or jurisdictional defect in the impugned judgment of the Appellate Court was found---Held, High Court could not interfere in the judgment and decree passed by the Court of competent jurisdiction for the reason that it was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court to believe or not to believe the evidence---No interference therefore, was warranted in the impugned judgment of the Appellate Court in exercise of the constitutional jurisdiction under Art.199 of the Constitution---Constitutional petition was dismissed.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 YLR 2752 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : Mst. SHABANA KAUSAR

Side Opponent : AURANGZEB

S. 497(2) (5)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.365-B---Bail, cancellation of---Application for---Further inquiry-Case against accused was lodged by the complainant with a delay of fifty-five days of the alleged occurrence and during that intervening period mother of the petitioner had not made any effort to get a criminal case registered regarding abduction of her daughter/petitioner---Record had shown that petitioner had left the house of accused herself and after that she lodged the impugned F.I.R. against him---Petitioners had also filed a suit for dissolution of marriage which was pending before the Judge Family Court---Petitioner had also filed a private complaint in the court of Senior Civil Judge/Magistrate Section 30, in which she admitted her marriage with accused---Nikah Nama, even if was not a registered document, yet in the light of the suit for dissolution of marriage the fact of Nikah was admitted by the petitioner herself and the fact was yet to be decided by the Judge, Family Court as to whether Nikah Nama was a registered document or not---Trial Court had rightly observed that case against accused called for further inquiry into his guilt within the purview of subsection (2) of S.497, Cr. P. C.---Allegation levelled by the petitioner for misusing the concession of bail by accused was neither supported by the counsel for the petitioner during the course of arguments nor any document had been produced before the court to substantiate that bald allegation---No illegality therefore existed in the order of discretion exercised by the Trial Court in favour of accused. Application for cancellation of bail was declined.

………………………………………….

Citation Name : 2008 YLR 2735 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD AKBER

Side Opponent : State

S.496-A---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Quashing of F.I.R.---Accused were nominated in the F.I.R. for abduction of the girl and mala fides on their part were apparent---Accused were neither appearing before the police in the investigation, nor were producing the alleged abductee before the police---Controversial questions involved in the registration of the case and alleged innocence claimed by the accused could be resolved through investigation---Court could not assume the role of an investigator---Accused through abuse of process of law had, prima facie, filed a suit for dissolution of marriage at a place other than the normal place of abode of the abductee---Nothing was available in favour of accused for quashing the F.I.R.---Unhealthy trend of filing quashment petitions frequently against the regist ration of criminal cases was deprecated and discouraged---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

………………………………………….